1955 Abarth 210 vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 249 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 2030 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Abarth 210. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 210 | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Abarth | Land Rover |
| Model | 210 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 633 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 100 L |
