1955 Abarth 210 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1540 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Abarth 210. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 210 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 633 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 56 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 87 L |