1955 Abarth 210 vs. 2006 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2006 Toyota RunX is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota RunX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota RunX (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota RunX should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210.
Because 1955 Abarth 210 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 210. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 2006 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 210 | RunX |
Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 633 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 56 mm | 91.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |