1955 Abarth 210 vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Dodge Challenger has automatic transmission and 1955 Abarth 210 has manual transmission. 1955 Abarth 210 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Challenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 2009 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | 210 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 633 cc | 3518 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |