1955 Abarth 210 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 120 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210.
Because 1955 Abarth 210 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 210. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth 210 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Abarth | Holden |
| Model | 210 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 633 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 153 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2700 mm |
