1955 Abarth 210 vs. 2010 Kia Forte
To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Forte (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Forte weights approximately 822 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Abarth 210 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 210. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Forte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 2010 Kia Forte | |
Make | Abarth | Kia |
Model | 210 | Forte |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 633 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 1232 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4481 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 52 L |