1955 Abarth 210 vs. 2010 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2010 Smart ForTwo is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 1,000 cc (3 cylinders), 2010 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Smart ForTwo (70 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 430 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 2010 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Abarth | Smart |
Model | 210 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 633 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 33 L |