1955 Abarth 210 vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (238 HP) has 205 more horse power than 1955 Abarth 210. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth 210.
Because 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Abarth 210. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1955 Abarth 210 has manual transmission. 1955 Abarth 210 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | 210 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 633 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 238 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 80 L |