1955 Abarth Coupe vs. 2000 AC Aceca
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth Coupe would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1955 Abarth Coupe. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 710 kg more than 1955 Abarth Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth Coupe | 2000 AC Aceca | |
Make | Abarth | AC |
Model | Coupe | Aceca |
Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1975 cc | 3504 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 346 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 81 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 90 L |