1955 Abarth Coupe vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth Coupe would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1955 Abarth Coupe. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 692 kg more than 1955 Abarth Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Abarth Coupe | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | Coupe | CTS |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1975 cc | 3179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 88 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1592 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 66 L |
