1955 Abarth Coupe vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth Coupe would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1955 Abarth Coupe. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 856 kg more than 1955 Abarth Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth Coupe | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | Coupe | CTS |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1975 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 68 L |