1955 Abarth Renault vs. 1990 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1990 Ford Mustang is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth Renault. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth Renault would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Abarth Renault (109 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1990 Ford Mustang. (105 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Abarth Renault should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Mustang weights approximately 370 kg more than 1955 Abarth Renault.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth Renault | 1990 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | Renault | Mustang |
Year Released | 1955 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2301 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 45 L |