1955 Abarth Renault vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth Renault. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth Renault would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Compass (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1955 Abarth Renault. (109 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1955 Abarth Renault.
Because 1955 Abarth Renault is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth Renault. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth Renault | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | Renault | Compass |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 51 L |