1955 AC 2-Litre vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 AC 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 AC 2-Litre would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1955 AC 2-Litre. (76 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1955 AC 2-Litre.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 AC 2-Litre. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 AC 2-Litre. (136 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 AC 2-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
1955 AC 2-Litre | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | AC | Jeep |
Model | 2-Litre | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 191 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 72 L |