1955 AC 2-Litre vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 AC 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 AC 2-Litre would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 AC 2-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot RCZ (197 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1955 AC 2-Litre. (76 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 1955 AC 2-Litre.
Because 1955 AC 2-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 AC 2-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 AC 2-Litre | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | AC | Peugeot |
Model | 2-Litre | RCZ |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1359 mm |