1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 vs. 1952 Allard K3
To start off, 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1952 Allard K3. (95 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K3 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 | 1952 Allard K3 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Allard |
| Model | 1900 | K3 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1974 cc | 3622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 95.3 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 59 L |
