1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 vs. 1961 Austin A 40
To start off, 1961 Austin A 40 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 1,974 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 | 1961 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | 1900 | A 40 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1974 cc | 948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 64.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 76.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2220 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 45 L |