1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 vs. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 1,973 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 (114 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 230 kg more than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 | 1996 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 1900 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1955 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1973 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2210 mm |