1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 vs. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 574 kg more than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 | 1997 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1900 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1974 cc | 5665 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 99.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 91.4 mm |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1524 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2690 mm |
