1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 350 kg more than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 1900 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1974 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 61 L |