1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 118 more horse power than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 737 kg more than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lincoln |
Model | 1900 | LS |
Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1974 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 232 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 68 L |