1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 vs. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (291 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 800 kg more than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 | 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 1900 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1974 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 291 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 95 L |