1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 404 kg more than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900.
Because 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 1900 | 6 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1974 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 87.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1354 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 64 L |