1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 has manual transmission. 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | 1900 | XF |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1974 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 237 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 70 L |