1955 Alpine A 106 vs. 1949 Bristol 450
To start off, 1955 Alpine A 106 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Bristol 450 (154 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1955 Alpine A 106. (20 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1955 Alpine A 106. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Bristol 450 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1955 Alpine A 106. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Alpine A 106 | 1949 Bristol 450 | |
Make | Alpine | Bristol |
Model | A 106 | 450 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 20 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 530 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 54 L |