1955 Alpine A 106 vs. 1980 Ford Falcon

To start off, 1980 Ford Falcon is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Ford Falcon (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1955 Alpine A 106. (20 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1955 Alpine A 106. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Ford Falcon weights approximately 840 kg more than 1955 Alpine A 106. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Ford Falcon (228 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1980 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Alpine A 106.

Compare all specifications:

1955 Alpine A 106 1980 Ford Falcon
Make Alpine Ford
Model A 106 Falcon
Year Released 1955 1980
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 747 cc 3273 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 20 HP 109 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 45 Nm 228 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 530 kg 1370 kg
Vehicle Length 3700 mm 4740 mm
Vehicle Width 1450 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2110 mm 2830 mm