1955 Alpine A 106 vs. 1995 Mazda Midge

To start off, 1995 Mazda Midge is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1955 Alpine A 106. (20 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1955 Alpine A 106. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda Midge weights approximately 436 kg more than 1955 Alpine A 106. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1955 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Alpine A 106.

Compare all specifications: