1955 Alvis TC 21 vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Alvis TC 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Alvis TC 21 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Alvis TC 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1955 Alvis TC 21. (105 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1955 Alvis TC 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Alvis TC 21 weights approximately 490 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Alvis TC 21 (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1955 Alvis TC 21 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Alvis TC 21 | 1976 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Alvis | Mazda |
Model | TC 21 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2480 mm |