1955 Alvis TC 21 vs. 1997 Mazda SW-X
To start off, 1997 Mazda SW-X is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Alvis TC 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Alvis TC 21 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Alvis TC 21 weights approximately 345 kg more than 1997 Mazda SW-X.
Because 1955 Alvis TC 21 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Alvis TC 21. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Mazda SW-X has automatic transmission and 1955 Alvis TC 21 has manual transmission. 1955 Alvis TC 21 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Mazda SW-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Alvis TC 21 | 1997 Mazda SW-X | |
Make | Alvis | Mazda |
Model | TC 21 | SW-X |
Year Released | 1955 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1105 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2620 mm |