1955 Alvis TC 21 vs. 2006 Ford F-250
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Alvis TC 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Alvis TC 21 would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1955 Alvis TC 21. (105 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1955 Alvis TC 21.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Alvis TC 21. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Alvis TC 21. (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Alvis TC 21.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Alvis TC 21 | 2006 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Alvis | Ford |
| Model | TC 21 | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4198 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 17.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 6250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3970 mm |
