1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. (125 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Cadillac |
| Model | Sapphire | 62 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3435 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 79 L |
