1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire vs. 1964 Holden EH

To start off, 1964 Holden EH is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. (85 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire weights approximately 245 kg more than 1964 Holden EH.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. (160 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1964 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire.

Compare all specifications:

1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire 1964 Holden EH
Make Armstrong Siddeley Holden
Model Sapphire EH
Year Released 1955 1964
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2309 cc 2928 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 85 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 160 Nm 237 Nm
Torque RPM 1750 RPM 1600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1360 kg 1115 kg
Vehicle Length 4580 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1570 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2670 mm