1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1966 Triumph Vitesse is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire would be higher. At 3,435 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire (125 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1966 Triumph Vitesse. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph Vitesse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Triumph |
Model | Sapphire | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1955 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3435 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 89 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 38 L |