1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire vs. 1990 Audi 200
To start off, 1990 Audi 200 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire would be higher. At 2,290 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Audi 200 (150 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire.
Because 1990 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Audi 200 (210 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. (189 Nm). This means 1990 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire | 1990 Audi 200 | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Audi |
Model | Sapphire | 200 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2290 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 150 HP |
Torque | 189 Nm | 210 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Top Speed | 155 km/hour | 215 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2660 mm |