1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire vs. 2003 Ford Puma

To start off, 2003 Ford Puma is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire would be higher. At 3,435 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire (125 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2003 Ford Puma. (99 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire weights approximately 792 kg more than 2003 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire (247 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Puma. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Puma.

Compare all specifications:

1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire 2003 Ford Puma
Make Armstrong Siddeley Ford
Model Sapphire Puma
Year Released 1955 2003
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3435 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 125 HP 99 HP
Engine RPM 4700 RPM 6150 RPM
Torque 247 Nm 146 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 7.0:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1830 kg 1038 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 3380 mm 2450 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 45 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]