1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. (125 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 592 kg more than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. (247 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Ford |
| Model | Sapphire | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3435 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 247 Nm | 475 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 2422 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 2120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 132 L |
