1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire.
Because 2012 Audi A6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Audi |
Model | Sapphire | A6 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2290 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4915 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 75 L |