1955 Aston Martin DB2 vs. 1969 Jaguar E-Type

To start off, 1969 Jaguar E-Type is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Aston Martin DB2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Aston Martin DB2 would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Jaguar E-Type (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1955 Aston Martin DB2. (108 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 1955 Aston Martin DB2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jaguar E-Type weights approximately 245 kg more than 1955 Aston Martin DB2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Compare all specifications:

1955 Aston Martin DB2 1969 Jaguar E-Type
Make Aston Martin Jaguar
Model DB2 E-Type
Year Released 1955 1969
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2579 cc 4235 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 108 HP 225 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1155 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Length 4310 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1640 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1190 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2450 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 77 L 63 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]