1955 Aston Martin DB3 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Aston Martin DB3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Aston Martin DB3 would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1955 Aston Martin DB3. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1955 Aston Martin DB3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 885 kg more than 1955 Aston Martin DB3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Aston Martin DB3. (244 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Aston Martin DB3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Aston Martin DB3 | 2000 Chevrolet Blazer | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Chevrolet |
| Model | DB3 | Blazer |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2922 cc | 4300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 1890 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1730 mm |
