1955 Aston Martin DB3 vs. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3

To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Aston Martin DB3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Aston Martin DB3 would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Aston Martin DB3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Aston Martin DB3 (138 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Aston Martin DB3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 615 kg more than 1955 Aston Martin DB3.

Because 1955 Aston Martin DB3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Aston Martin DB3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Aston Martin DB3. (244 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Aston Martin DB3.

Compare all specifications:

1955 Aston Martin DB3 2000 Chrysler ESX 3
Make Aston Martin Chrysler
Model DB3 ESX 3
Year Released 1955 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2922 cc 1499 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 138 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 244 Nm 332 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1005 kg 1620 kg
Vehicle Width 1510 mm 1890 mm