1955 Aston Martin DB3 vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Aston Martin DB3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Aston Martin DB3 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1955 Aston Martin DB3. (138 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1955 Aston Martin DB3.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Aston Martin DB3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Aston Martin DB3. (244 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Aston Martin DB3.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Aston Martin DB3 | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Aston Martin | Jeep |
Model | DB3 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2922 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1700 mm |