1955 Austin A 135 vs. 1962 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1962 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 135 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 135. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 135. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin A 135 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1962 Cadillac DeVille.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (590 Nm) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 135. (251 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 135.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 135 | 1962 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 135 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1955 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 6389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 590 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 3300 mm |