1955 Austin A 135 vs. 1969 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 135 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 135. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 135.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Austin A 135 | 1969 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 135 | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 3390 mm |
