1955 Austin A 135 vs. 1996 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1996 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Austin A 135 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota 4Runner (123 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 135. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 135. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin A 135 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1996 Toyota 4Runner.
Because 1996 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Austin A 135. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota 4Runner (295 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 135. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 135.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 135 | 1996 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 135 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1955 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 295 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |