1955 Austin A 135 vs. 2004 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 135 would be higher. At 4,193 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 135. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 135. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin A 135 weights approximately 347 kg more than 2004 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (541 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 135. (251 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 135.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 135 | 2004 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | A 135 | XK |
Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 4193 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 541 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1833 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2590 mm |