1955 Austin A 135 vs. 2010 Kia Venga

To start off, 2010 Kia Venga is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Austin A 135 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Austin A 135 (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2010 Kia Venga. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Austin A 135 should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Venga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin A 135 weights approximately 470 kg more than 2010 Kia Venga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1955 Austin A 135 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Austin A 135. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Venga, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Austin A 135 (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Venga. (220 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1955 Austin A 135 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Venga.

Compare all specifications: