1955 Austin A 30 vs. 1960 DKW Munga
To start off, 1960 DKW Munga is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 980 cc (3 cylinders), 1960 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 DKW Munga (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 30. (28 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 DKW Munga weights approximately 430 kg more than 1955 Austin A 30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Austin A 30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Austin A 30 | 1960 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Austin | DKW |
| Model | A 30 | Munga |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 802 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 28 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 7.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 31 L |
