1955 Austin A 30 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1963 Triumph 2000 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 30. (28 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 490 kg more than 1955 Austin A 30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 30. (54 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 30.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 30 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Austin | Triumph |
Model | A 30 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 802 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 28 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 54 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 58 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 64 L |