1955 Austin A 40 vs. 1954 Austin A 40
To start off, 1955 Austin A 40 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. Both 1955 Austin A 40 and 1954 Austin A 40 are equipped with a 1,200 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 41 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin A 40 weights approximately 4 kg more than 1954 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 40 | 1954 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Austin | Austin |
Model | A 40 | A 40 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 7.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1026 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 54 L |