1955 Austin A 40 vs. 1960 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1960 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Jeep CJ5 (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 40.
Because 1960 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1960 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Austin A 40 | 1960 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 40 | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2060 mm |